सीआरपीएफ के महानिदेशक को कनाडा सरकार ने अपने देश में आने से रोका क्यों की वे ऐसे संघटन में सर्विस दी है जो आतंकवाद और मानवाधिकार का अलंघन के दोषी हैं ,

सीआरपीएफ के महानिदेशक को कनाडा सरकार ने अपने देश में आने से रोका क्यों की वे ऐसे संघटन में सर्विस  दी है जो आतंकवाद और मानवाधिकार का अलंघन के दोषी हैं ,

***

सीआरपीएफ के पूर्व आई जी ढिल्लों को कनाडा सरकार ने अपने देश में प्रवेश से इंकार कर दिया क्यों की कनाडा सरकार ने माना है की सीआरपीएफ भारत में आतंकवाद और मानवाधिकार के उलंघन करने वाले संघटन की सेवा में रहे हैं ,अक्सर सीआरपीएफ पर फर्जी मुठभेड़ और मानवाधिकार के उलंघन के आरोप लगते रहते हैं .

भारत सरकार ने भले ही इस कदम का विरोध किया हो लेकिन यह गंभीर और सही आरोप है ,इन सुरक्षा बलों पर हमेशा ऐसे आरोप लगते हैं ,सरकार को चाहिए तो यह था भारत के सुरक्षा बलों को ऐसी घटनाओ से रोका जाये ,छत्तीसगढ़ में तो सीबीआई तक ने इनपर सामूहिक बलात्कार के आरोप लगाये थे .

Canada denies entry to retired CRPF officer over ‘rights abuse’, India takes up matter with Canadian govt

Tejinder Singh Dhillon, who retired as CRPF inspector general of police in 2010, was denied entry at Vancouver airport as he had served with the Force, which had “committed widespread and systemic human rights abuses’

Dhillon said the officers who interrogated him behaved in an “unreasonable and indecent manner”.(HT Photo)

Updated: May 24, 2017 00:23 IST

By Anirudh Bhattacharyya, Hindustan Times, Ottawa

Relations between India and Canada could take another hit as a retired senior CRPF officer was denied entry at Vancouver airport, partly because immigration authorities deemed him to have served a government that engages in “terrorism, systematic or gross human rights violations, or genocide”.

Tejinder Singh Dhillon, who retired with the rank of inspector general of police from the Central Reserve Police Force in 2010, was declared inadmissible under a subsection of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act last week.

India said on Tuesday that it has taken up the matter with the government of Canada.

In a statement on Tuesday, Canada’s high commissioner to India Nadir Patel said, “We regret any inconvenience that may have been experienced by this individual and their family.”

A document given to Dhillon at the airport had mentioned that he served a government engaged in “terrorism, systematic or gross human rights violations, or genocide, a war crime or a crime against humanity”. This startling condemnation of India was removed in a second report issued by immigration authorities at Vancouver airport. But they still held he could not be granted entry as he had served with the CRPF, which had “committed widespread and systemic human rights abuses, for example torture, arbitrary detention, murder and sexual assault”.

For his part, Canada’s envoy to India noted that Canada welcomes record number of Indians, and with such a large number of applications, “oversights on visa applications can happen which is regrettable.”

The envoy tried to explain the situation, saying, “Form letters in use by the Government of Canada include generic language taken from Canada’s legislation. In this case, the language does not reflect the Government of Canada’s policy toward India or any particular organization, including the Central Reserve Police Force of India.”

Speaking over phone from Ludhiana, Dhillon, who returned after being denied entry, said he had been travelling to Canada for more than 30 years including several times as a serving officer of the CRPF.